Are SIMI, Bajrang Dal two sides of same coin?
CNN-IBN <_blank>
Thu, Sep 18, 2008
The spate of attacks on Christians and churches continues in the
BJP-ruled states of Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh.
Coastal districts of Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada, Chikmagalur and Udupi
are tense after 14 churches were attacked on Sunday, allegedly by the
activists of Hindu outfit Bajrang Dal.
On Wednesday, a mob attacked a church and statue of St Mary in Kolar in
south Karnataka, taking the number of attacks to 19 in the past one
month. Security has been stepped up following the incident. Police say
the situation is tense but under control.
Last month Orissa too witnessed a similar flare up. Christians were
attacked in the Kandhamal district and 24 people died in the communal
clashes that followed.
As the Government considers bringing in tougher measures to deal with
terror, CNN-IBN debates if Hindu outfits like Bajrang Dal could be
compared with Islamist terror groups like the banned Students Islamic
Movement of India (SIMI).
To debate the controversial issue on Face the Nation were the President
of Indian Christian Voice, Dr Abraham Mathai; and BJP leader Gopal
Prasad Sinha.
Abraham Mathai kickstarted the debate and strongly argued the Bajrang
Dal was terrorising minorities in the state. Mathai and also hinted at
state complicity.
“The state is talking about SIMI activists being in hiding and here we
have the Bajrang Dal people openly admitting to having done this. How
can you differentiate between the two? Should SIMI be banned just
because they are Muslims?” he asked.
Mathai quoted incidents of Bajrang Dal activists being caught in the
act. “In Nanded, they were caught making bombs and even confessed to
having dressed as Muslims,” he alleged.
But Gopal Prasad Sinha lashed back and said it was unfair to compare
Bajrang Dal with SIMI. “It’s a well-established fact that SIMI is an
anti-national force, is part of Lashkar-e-Toiba, al-Qaeda and is
responsible for blasts across the country,” he said.
Sinha also defended Bajrang Dal’s action as a “reaction to a planned
mischief to convert people in Karnataka”.
“I don’t support the violence of Bajrang Dal but how do we react to
these things,” he asked arguing while Bajrang Dal had an ideology, SIMI
was destroying the idea of India.
“SIMI is an international force, a part of an international terror
group,” he said.
Mathai retorted and said SIMI and Bajrang Dal shared the same underlying
ideology.
“Bajrang Dal activists have killed 50 Indians in Orissa — they
haven’t killed Pakistanis, Bangaladeshis or others. Is that not
anti-national? Just because they are from a majority community and have
the backing of a political party, should they be spared?” he asked.
But the Bajrang Dal has also been accused of distributing tridents,
bringing down the Babri Masjid and has been compared with the Nazis.
In fact, senior BJP leader Atal Behari Vajpayee said he was ashamed of
the group’s activities. However, Sinha dismissed these arguments as
exaggerated public reaction.
As regards forcible conversions, Mathai argued there has been no
conviction despite there being the draconian anti-conversion laws in
place in five states.
“Because they have failed, they are trying miserably hard,” Mathai said,
adding, if conversions gave someone respect and dignity, they were not
wrong.